F-100 Rumormill (nothing official, please) - Ford Inside News Community
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 13 (permalink) Old 10-10-2011, 03:39 PM Thread Starter
2b2
Mercury C557
 
2b2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: N NW of Atlantis (Reno)
Posts: 18,621
Blog Entries: 5
F-100 Rumormill (nothing official, please)

F100 given the green light again - Mackintire @ BON

photocredit: Ford.wieck.com

(part 1)
At first I chocked this up as a a pipe dream, but the chips are starting to fall in place and I am beginning to believe it. Giving a little more credit to this is the fact that I have recently visited 5 Ford dealerships and all have said that they have been receiving requests from customers for an updated truck smaller than the F150.

So here's the latest rumor.

2014 release as a 2015.

Chassis based off of the [strike]F150 but narrower and modified[/strike] Full size Ford Transit.

EB 2.0 and EB 2.7 are the suspected engines. Ford can pull many parts from the F150, but the narrowed chassis will require unique sheet metal and interior.

The goal appears to be to have a smaller vehicle that fits in the slot under the F150 with 2-3 mpg increase over a 2x4 F150 and sell at $2-3K less than an F150.

This line of thinking has merit as there has been discussion on how to get the current F150 to drop the almost 1000lbs required to make up the currently expected deficit generated by the upcoming 2016 CAFE regulations.

I am of the belief that the F100 would help pull up the current F series CAFE ratings and would be able to be produced at the same factory that currently produces the F150.

(part 2)
Here are the FACTS

Ford stated that the US is not getting the T6.

Ford stated that the F100 project had been placed on hold and could be restarted if necessary

Ford has stated that they need the F150 to drop 1000lbs to make their 2016 fuel economy goals

Ford had assumed that the EB 2.0 liter and the weight loss of 1000lbs would reach their increased fuel economy goal

Ford has been surprised at the number of consumers that still want a truck smaller than the F150. This info was sourced from multiple Ford dealerships.

Ford currently has the EB 2.7 liter engine is development and expects to have it available in a Lincoln mid 2013. This wouldn't be the first time Ford has made a habit out of releasing a engine in a car a year or two before the same engine is released in a truck..

The Ford transit is now scheduled to be build in Kansas, starting 2013

Back to the world of possibility:

Unless Ford intends to sell a lot of transits, it is very likely that the F100 will be built on a modified transit platform in that same plant.
2b2 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 13 (permalink) Old 10-10-2011, 04:06 PM
Ford Ka
 
Suziebob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 22
Re: F-100 Rumormill (please: nothing official)

So is this going to end up being an American-designed alternative to the F-150, or will the F-100 just become the F-150?
Suziebob is offline  
post #3 of 13 (permalink) Old 10-14-2011, 05:48 AM
Ford Mondeo
 
AM222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,466
Re: F-100 Rumormill (nothing official, please)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2b2 View Post
The goal appears to be to have a smaller vehicle that fits in the slot under the F150 with 2-3 mpg increase over a 2x4 F150 and sell at $2-3K less than an F150.
Its funny because that sounds like a T6 Ranger which is albout 90% the size of an F-150.


Maybe the F-100 will be a North American made USDM version of the T6 Ranger?

Remember One Ford... so why make 2 unrelated but similar sized pickups?
AM222 is offline  
post #4 of 13 (permalink) Old 10-14-2011, 10:10 AM
Focus RS WRC
 
scford58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 732
Re: F-100 Rumormill (nothing official, please)

Thanks for the post 2b2. IMHO it sounds like the F-100 is the perfect fit for those of us who would not drive the F-150. The current F-150 is just too big and hard to handle/park. I think for the F-100 (or the T6 Ranger) to be successful in the U.S. it will need to get more than just 2-3 mpg better than it's big brother. Also, the price could and should be better than the reported $2-3K less than the F-150.
scford58 is offline  
post #5 of 13 (permalink) Old 10-15-2011, 05:29 PM Thread Starter
2b2
Mercury C557
 
2b2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: N NW of Atlantis (Reno)
Posts: 18,621
Blog Entries: 5
Re: F-100 Rumormill (nothing official, please)

YvW, scford58

I'm kinda wondering if the first version of the inevitable F-100 will actually be small enough?
afaik the T-6 Ranger isn't that much smaller than the F-series -- WISH I could them side-by-side! -- think the generation After the first F-100 (with 'step2' weight cutting) might actually be closer to what many are Now asking for...
but imho
(remembering a dinky foreign pickup a friend had back in the 80's,
& like the very-used one a teacher had too)
I'm thinking eventually they'll need a Courier-ish F-50
2b2 is offline  
post #6 of 13 (permalink) Old 10-15-2011, 07:58 PM
FIN Moderator
 
nruggiero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 2,104
Re: F-100 Rumormill (nothing official, please)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2b2 View Post
YvW, scford58

I'm kinda wondering if the first version of the inevitable F-100 will actually be small enough?
afaik the T-6 Ranger isn't that much smaller than the F-series -- WISH I could them side-by-side! -- think the generation After the first F-100 (with 'step2' weight cutting) might actually be closer to what many are Now asking for...
but imho
(remembering a dinky foreign pickup a friend had back in the 80's,
& like the very-used one a teacher had too)
I'm thinking eventually they'll need a Courier-ish F-50
I think if they do a midsized pickup it needs to be called F-50. The compact pickup could be called the Courier. The F-100 was always a large pickup. I don't think it would be right using the F-100 name on a midsized truck.
nruggiero is offline  
post #7 of 13 (permalink) Old 10-28-2011, 08:43 AM
Ford Mondeo
 
AM222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,466
Re: F-100 Rumormill (nothing official, please)

Quote:
Originally Posted by nruggiero View Post
I think if they do a midsized pickup it needs to be called F-50. The compact pickup could be called the Courier. The F-100 was always a large pickup. I don't think it would be right using the F-100 name on a midsized truck.
If you think about it the first F-100 (2nd gen F-series) is about the same size as modern mid-size pickups.


Length: 198.3 in
Width: 73.5 in
Wheelbase: 115.0 in

The New Ranger (T6) is actually larger

Length: 211.0 in
Width: 72.8 in
Wheelbase: 127.0 in

PS: Looks like the New Ranger also comes with only one wheelbase (still haven't seen a short one), meaning the single cab models have long cargo beds (floor length of 91.2 in or 7 ft and 7.2 in)
AM222 is offline  
post #8 of 13 (permalink) Old 10-28-2011, 03:16 PM Thread Starter
2b2
Mercury C557
 
2b2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: N NW of Atlantis (Reno)
Posts: 18,621
Blog Entries: 5
Re: F-100 Rumormill (nothing official, please)

imho they will (& need to) call all U.S. pickups F-something
maybe instead of or in addition to an F-50
they could have an F-15 ? (with afterburners? ) or
F-5
F-1.5
F-.5
?

visual aid:

Classic XY Falcon Ute
found at "KEEP FORD Falcon RWD and Export It to North America" on facebook
2b2 is offline  
post #9 of 13 (permalink) Old 09-18-2012, 04:09 PM
Ford Ka
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Moose Jaw Saskatchewan(SK) Canada
Posts: 3
Re: F-100 Rumormill (nothing official, please)

This picture looks like the Austrailian Ford Ranger. They already have a 2.0 Liter engine as well as a 2.0 &4.0 Liter diesel engine. Austrailia also has a truck called the UTE which looks to me like a shrunken Ranchero.
Terry is offline  
post #10 of 13 (permalink) Old 02-28-2013, 09:20 AM
Ford Ka
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1
Re: F-100 Rumormill (nothing official, please)

http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2013/02...-or-f-100.html

PickupTrucks.com has a good article on the F100. The article speculates that the 3.2-liter turbodiesel inline five-cylinder that will be available in the 2014 Ford Transit might be an option.
Now that would be a great combination and something many would be interested in.
TruckFan is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Tags
f100, official, rumormill

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Inside News Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome