Interesting...This would leave it open for the Taurus/Explorer to get a proper large RWD based platform once the stretched Mondeo runs the cycle.
|
|
Interesting...This would leave it open for the Taurus/Explorer to get a proper large RWD based platform once the stretched Mondeo runs the cycle.
The early bird gets the worm..but the second mouse gets the cheese.
OR...
like this thread is all about,
they design a *modular* platform (crossreference) that will allow transverse-F-AWD *and* longitudinal-RWD
^ I'm not sure, SP1966,
but thought Nissan had Rwd & Fwd platforms that were quite similar but didn't really share (much) anything...
...tho remember reading that Chrysler had a platform capable of Both (LH?) but never built both on it
^Actually the LX platform (current 300 and Charger) is a heavily modified LH platform, so technically they did build both.
That's what common belief is, but it's completely false. They used a bunch of Mercedes suspension stuff and the transmission, but even that is gone for the refreshed models.
Last edited by 2b2; 12-08-2012 at 09:04 PM.
Maybe, It looks a little over the top idea but I think it can be.... :)
"The surest way not to fail is to determine to succeed." value point distribution
belated Welcome & thanks for voting/posting, Vlester
&
new thought/crossreference
Could a CD4+r.w.d. platform produce a light/compact pickup 'truck'?
Not exactly thinking of a Ranchero/Falcon-Ute (the Ute iirc has used a half-frame design for the cargo part)
rather building on the idea of an all-unibody trucklet.
& to fulfill my crazy idea quotient, maybe having a 2-mode rear passenger compartment that could morph into an extended 8ft bed.
Since this wouldn't be related to the F-150, & could theoretically be either-both RWD *&* (F)AWD, instead calling it an F-100, I'll go with "F-99" ... not sure if sharing some frontend styling-shape with the nextgen Explorer/Territory would be beneficial or not.
&
just for grins / NOT related:
![]()
Last edited by 2b2; 02-14-2013 at 01:20 PM.
|
|
Bookmarks