Panoramic Roof MPG Penalty
NEWS
 

  1. Welcome to Ford Inside News General discussion forum for Ford

    Welcome to Ford Inside News - a website dedicated to all things Ford.

    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, Join Ford Inside News today!
     
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Panoramic Roof MPG Penalty

  1. #1
    Ford Escort
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    69
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 30 Times in 12 Posts

    Panoramic Roof MPG Penalty

    Another new MKZ Hybrid "review" online (which like the prior ones seems to be by someone who sat in but did not drive the car at an event) mentions being told by the Lincoln reps something I suspected but which I don't think we've heard formally announced - that the new trick panoramic roof weight penalty costs the hybrid 3 MPG, from 45 to 42 MPG overall. I wonder what the performance penalty is as well...

    So let the great debate begin...

    Do you think the new, large panoramic retractable roof is worth 3 MPG hybrid buyers?

  2. Remove Advertisements
    Ford Inside News
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Ford Flex
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    2,471
    Thanks
    666
    Thanked 995 Times in 743 Posts

    Re: Panoramic Roof MPG Penalty

    I wouldn't want it under any circumstances. It doesn't even open all the way.

  4. #3
    Ford Focus ZX LincolnFanFl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Tampa Bay, FL
    Posts
    386
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked 105 Times in 65 Posts

    Re: Panoramic Roof MPG Penalty

    That's a good question. On the Hybrid, this might be a concern to some people. Would be interesting to know what the impact will be on the V6 - I guess far less.

    The Pano-roof is an amazing feature on this car but after all, it is also quite expensive and therefore, it has to be a perfect fit to become a success. The "package" has to be right.

    Although it's somewhat OT, but I would really like to know if the power rear sunshade could be retro-fitted once you order the car with the pano-roof since you can't order both features at once. I hope all MKZ's will be pre-wired for it. I guess many readers might be bored by now by me pointing out this ordering-conflict - but I think it might be quite important.

    The availability of the sunshade may only be a minor issue for some potential buyers, but some might consider saving some $$ and going for the sunshade and regular moonroof instead. I realy hope that Lincoln finds a way to offer both at some point in time because if they really want customers to opt for this pano-roof, they certainly shouldn't deliver any arguments to them to NOT opt for it by excluding other features in return. In the luxury market, "either..or" doesn't sell too well.

    I understand that the lower MPG-rating probably is a result of simple physics so I won't blame Lincoln for it - but it's an additional factor that might lower the number of ordered pano-roofs. Assuming the development of this roof was everything but cheap, I guess they want to sell as many as possible. That's why they shouldn't exclude any other options in return and and prevent it from becoming less desirable.

    My 2 cents..

  5. #4
    Mercury C557 2b2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    N NW of Atlantis (Reno)
    Posts
    13,213
    Thanks
    2,724
    Thanked 1,195 Times in 911 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Panoramic Roof MPG Penalty

    imho the panoroof as is
    is a seriously compromised feature
    - way darker than nec.
    - flashy one-piece design rather than good (2-pane) design imho
    &
    if its weight can ding the mpg that much
    I hate to think what it will do to the handling

    (would love to know the weight difference between the pano and the Edge/MKX's BAMR-Vistaroof, too)


    Quote Originally Posted by LincolnFanFl View Post
    ...I guess many readers might be bored by now by me pointing out this ordering-conflict - but I think it might be quite important...
    nah, don't worry LincolnFanFl
    how will FoMoCo ever learn if you don't teach them? ...over & over &...
    besides
    FiN has a time-honored tradition of us(me) 'testifying' & promoting pet peaves/beliefs whenEVER possible

  6. #5
    Ford Sport Ka
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    45
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Re: Panoramic Roof MPG Penalty

    I heard this about the roof and mpg as well from my test drive rep. Can it really be that heavy to make such a difference. If so, everyone riding in this car better get on a diet.

  7. #6
    Ford Escort GRIMEYtheFATMAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Deltona, FL
    Age
    31
    Posts
    59
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Panoramic Roof MPG Penalty

    Huh, I'd think the opposite would be necessary(occupants put on weight) in order for the center-of-gravity to remain at a reasonable height...

    Optimus Prime is a BAMF!

  8. #7
    Ford Falcon Ute Andrew L's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    Age
    25
    Posts
    3,283
    Thanks
    308
    Thanked 584 Times in 359 Posts

    Re: Panoramic Roof MPG Penalty

    I don't see anything on Lincoln's website about it. I wonder if it will get posted?
    Current Car: 2004 Lincoln LS V6 Luxury Cashmere Tri-Coat 3.0L Duratec V6 5 Speed Automatic with SST
    Previous Cars
    1994 Ford Econoline 150 Centaurus LTD Conversion Van Red and White 351 V8 4 Speed Automatic
    1999 Mercury Sable LS Premium Toreador Red Clear Coat Metalic 3.0L Duratec V6 4 Speed Automatic

  9. #8
    Mercury C557 2b2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    N NW of Atlantis (Reno)
    Posts
    13,213
    Thanks
    2,724
    Thanked 1,195 Times in 911 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Panoramic Roof MPG Penalty

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew L View Post
    I don't see anything on Lincoln's website about it. I wonder if it will get posted?
    hmm
    I figure it's possible to have well-over $10,000 in features on a vehicle between basic-engineering & topLux (not counting materials upgrades)
    & all that stuff has gotta weigh it down

    maybe just a matter of time before the gov'mint mandates specific MPG numbers for every variant?
    ('course imho the Mfgs already have all those numbers)
    .
    .
    .
    .
    wait for it
    .
    .
    .
    THAT's IT!!
    the reason LincolnFanFL can't get the rearwindowshade WITH the pano-roof is that the Z would be so top-heavy it'd flip over just shutting the door!

  10. #9
    Editor nsap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,170
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 113 Times in 41 Posts

    Re: Panoramic Roof MPG Penalty

    I'm going to just go out and say it...

    If this roof has rattles and squeaks like the Vista Roof in the MKX/MKT/Edge...it won't be worth the MPG penalty.

  11. #10
    Ford Focus ZX LincolnFanFl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Tampa Bay, FL
    Posts
    386
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked 105 Times in 65 Posts

    Re: Panoramic Roof MPG Penalty

    Quote Originally Posted by 2b2 View Post
    THAT's IT!!
    the reason LincolnFanFL can't get the rearwindowshade WITH the pano-roof is that the Z would be so top-heavy it'd flip over just shutting the door!


    Reminds me of a discussion I had a while ago on BlueOval Forum. I was quite disappointed that the Fusion Hybrid was only available in the SE trim (that was before they announced the Titanium will be available as a Hybrid, too) and therefore, you couldn't get the Sony-System. Somebody suggested that the reason for that might be the additional weight of that speaker-system. I first thought he was joking but he wasn't.

    A week later the same member was complaining that the Hybrid SE wasn't available with keyless start/stop. Boy, that was funny when I suggested to him that the start/stop button was obviously to heavy for the Hybrid..

  12. Remove Advertisements
    Ford Inside News
    Advertisements
     

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Similar Threads

  1. 2013 MKZ first Lincoln to get massive retractable roof?
    By Andrew L in forum Lincoln Brand News
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 11-09-2012, 03:45 PM
  2. Lincoln MkZ Teaser Video Showing Removable Roof in Action
    By ausrutherford in forum Lincoln Brand News
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-31-2012, 06:16 PM
  3. Lincoln MKZ's retractable roof caught in action
    By ausrutherford in forum Lincoln Brand News
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 03-30-2012, 11:16 AM
  4. AutoNews: Fkex: "Raising" The Roof
    By megeebee in forum Ford SUV/Crossover Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-11-2008, 09:34 AM
  5. Mustang offers new glass roof option
    By wingsnut in forum Mustang Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-12-2007, 07:05 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.2