I disagree
Elsewhere there was discussion about the MKConcept having hugely thick doors which led to the idea that the MKConcept having basically an Escape-sized interior...also supported by the hugely thick 'walls' visible when the hatch was open
so
if the interior & 'walls' are going to change structurally from the MKConcept, all bets are off as to just how much the production MKC will vary from the Escape's dimensions
imho it can't hurt
+ got a feeling we're (I'm) talking about relatively small differences
like
using the new 2.3 4cyl instead of the 2.0 4cyl
(also for Atkinson hybrids?!?)
or
using a new small 4cyl (1.6 gen2?) instead of the barely-rumored 1.5 3cyl
&
of course, the 2.7 vs 2.9 Nano v6 quandary
but
definitely, using a Nano-EB6 rather than a 2.3EB4 in some mid-large vehicles like the MKX vs Edge and Z vs a Fusion-ST/Sport
as I've harped, imho a sportsedan is more important than a coupe/'vert/coupe-cabrio for Lincoln
&
tho just an opinion from chopping, Yes it'll require significant changes from the 2-door form
&
veryAGREE, the sportsedan should be Lincoln-ONLY!
semi-divergent: still want to see a larger Continental-class Rwd platform...which, may as well spawn a Falcon too**; tho don't see a need for any other Ford based on it so far...
...'course what I really want is for a Rwd/longitudinal-engined version of the CD4+3
and even
a Rwd-capable shortened-CD4 (for MERCURY)
**edit
I 'remembered' a new idea
so make the one above a possible 'Fairlane'




)
Reply




Bookmarks